From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 14:24:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E0116A423 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3ED43D45 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:24:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10120 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 14:24:49 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Mar 2006 14:24:49 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1768728425; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:24:49 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Noah" References: <20060323154810.M48910@enabled.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 24 Mar 2006 09:24:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060323154810.M48910@enabled.com> Message-ID: <448xqzgbta.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Up On Unreliable Link X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:24:50 -0000 "Noah" writes: > Hi there, > > No response so far on the rdiff-backup mail list. > > Does anybody have experience and/or recommendations and/or scripts that could > help somebody who usning rdiff-backup up across an unreliable link? If > rdiff-backup fails in the middle of a backup it regresses to the last backup > that finished successfully. If you are running this across an unreliable link > you could consistently have a partial backup. > > I would like to know if there are systems to solving this situation. > > Hope to get some input from other users. It depends on exactly what form of unreliability you are dealing with on the connection. One simple strategy you might try is to break the backup into smaller pieces (and run them sequentially). That still leaves you with partial backups in case of a failure, but you get better checkpointing capability.