From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 20 22:13:23 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BBBBD16A4B3; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BF83A43FDD; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au)
Received: from freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cimlogic.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8L5FQvl031692;
	Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:15:26 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au)
Received: (from jb@localhost)
	by freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8L5FQtH031691;
	Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:15:26 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:15:25 +1000
From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
To: deischen@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030921051525.GA31537@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
References: <20030920.204425.25098720.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210106070.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210106070.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: h@schmalzbauer.de
cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports and -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 05:13:23 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 05:13:23 -0000

On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-)

Warner might, but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option
to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating
the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop.

I susect theat this puts much of the work on a few people rather than many.
I hope it doesn't require a volley of emails to each port maintainer to
resolve each one. People have jumped off buildings for less than that!

-- 
John Birrell