From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 27 23:17:42 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED2F1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 May 2009 23:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C399B8FC1F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 May 2009 23:17:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4RNHcXX056135;
	Thu, 28 May 2009 01:17:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	n4RNHcaU056097; Thu, 28 May 2009 01:17:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:17:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090527160021.3174fd00@gom>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905280113160.55698@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <6C96EEF057EDE24197FECB0D1EA035044A8F6EB461@h1341255.aoemedia.de>
	<744a9119476160472a319bbc9f4fd799.squirrel@relay.lc-words.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271756370.52750@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<065001c9def1$54ae3f40$fe0abdc0$@za.org>
	<20090527124014.6998139c@gom>
	<20090527203000.GA1328@fusion.opticnetworks.net>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905272235240.54915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<b79ecaef0905271420v354a9e5ct6c0b77ed310b1217@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090527145443.3a2e181e@gom>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905272358530.55278@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<ab7b49bc0905271515v5d6ca3fdtaaad2ef2ab0581e@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090527160021.3174fd00@gom>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:17:43 -0000

>
> therefore, it seems that keeping the list to fbsd issues is a valid
> point.

Which WILL end up with moderated list within some time. Current quality 
will not improve, only will get worse sooner or later.

The moderated list should be started quickly for simple reason:

at the beginning (almost) all people will use both lists, while all 
failures of moderated list will slowly come up. For example that 
posting rules are not defined precisely enough. Same with moderators,
after some time they will well organize themselves so "dead time" will be 
close to 0.

By some time it will work very well, so more and more people will shift to 
this. Of course not all, as part of them are happy with current status as 
a place to ask/talk about almost anything that have any remote connection 
to unix.

Everyone will be happy.