From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 08:31:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C37CFBB for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC3F280C for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m15so10609352wgh.33 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 01:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J8nlicMzbyo58rZ33SqcqD5XriHwPu+LbILJiZWfAXQ=; b=Gpxt5C8+1Wq7FLLFooElEBqbdgpwumUGYmj/LPdkxPH2xN8SYXQtPMlMfXVwxWIZe7 bPayopKM1kVGF0WLQfJ8rkgZ6w0uWtUPvfAn3D3cMtYkGMV4yjv5MA1ed8nE8MrNI8N6 LHn/SGNOePnFjQJhN5/GEsoMA3Q2YSMRo2C18YFnALY3Sdyy1AjpDbJrdzVyR0f5BwI1 lrjPUXpFeRkuytwksodb+iaDBkDbccJ7ce+LnLSUKebiDUBw8VP0LZm/E/2Wpvynczug kEdO/Ok8ejLRruugA5OBKNWJq7hOQ42Wc/qKePvpKrvJX86gJ/1sbuVarH/1ML9dt6c2 lOBg== X-Received: by 10.195.17.164 with SMTP id gf4mr57440163wjd.45.1404289869435; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 01:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jy8sm53584398wjc.7.2014.07.02.01.31.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jul 2014 01:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:31:04 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Koichiro IWAO Subject: Re: archivers/rpm build problem Message-ID: <20140702083103.GJ7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140701123008.GA77747@in-addr.com> <20140702062550.GI7307@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00000146f62c7bb6-13a698a3-9a41-4a29-98af-fe57c95b3325-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:31:11 -0000 --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +0000, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I can confirm the problem and will see if I can fix, I was wondering wh= y do you > > or other people use rpm for? I am planning to remove archivers/rpm and > > recommanding using archivers/rpm4 instead, so I need to need any corner= case > > where rpm4 cannot do rpm3 job. > >=20 > > btw the linux ports now directly use plain bsdtar :) >=20 > Can't argue with migrating rpm from 3 to 4. > At least I still use rpm. Not for extracting rpms but evaluating > rpm macros like 'rpm --eval %_bindir'. >=20 Then you might be happy to have rpm4 because rpm4 is what is mostly used to package/create rpms out there :) regards, Bapt --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOzw0cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzTSQCgvexpGXS7YVpKdV6Q5T9gluAS a6wAn33TvDFbEryH862Khtmamps1kAva =Lmuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Do4IU1xF/9sod/r6--