From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 21 5:51:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nexttown.buckhorn.net (user-208-129-165-66.inu.net [208.129.165.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E546514C30 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 05:51:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@buckhorn.net) Received: from buckhorn.net (nexttown.buckhorn.net [208.129.165.66]) by nexttown.buckhorn.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA27417 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:51:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@buckhorn.net) Message-ID: <3888645C.6584FA1A@buckhorn.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:51:24 -0600 From: Bob Martin Reply-To: Bob@buckhorn.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN vs. DNews References: <200001202307.SAA00898@benge.graphics.cornell.edu> <20000121115454.B6604@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > -On [20000121 00:14], Mitch Collinsworth (mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU) wrote: > > > >>All of this on a P200pro, 96mb RAM, and 50gb of ide disk. And we have > >>server to spare. We run our tucows mirror on the same box. (Of course, > >>I firmly beleive that 3x-stable is making all of this possible ;) > > > >Well since I'm preparing to build a new server soon I will consider > >DNEWS, too. :-) One thing you mentioned reminds me of a question I've > >been pondering. Disks. You said you're using 50 GB IDE. I have no IDE > >experience (yet) but recent discussions had left me wondering if IDE was > >really up to the challenge of news. I've been torn between buying new > >IDE drives and throwing some existing towers filled with 2 GB SCSI drives > >at it. (Yes, I have a lot of old 2 GB drives, 7 to a box.) Given the I/O > >profile of news I'm not yet convinced the IDE drives would be faster. For the record, we are using 3 western digital 7200rpm 27gb drives. 50gb is used for DNEWS spool, the rest for tucows mirrors (Less the OS of course) > > I work for an ISP. Our Current disk set-up is based on Seagate SCSI > Barracuda's of about 18 GB per disk, running over Fibrechannel. This is > for a full feed (20 or so peers) of about 90-100 GB a day. > This large feed size is mostly due to alt.binaries, because some tests > were done which came to 12-20 GB of normal usenet traffic (no > alt.binaries and spam). Quite a difference. We are also ISP's. According to C&W, and UU Net, a full feed is about 12gb a day. From what I have heard, (and experience) that's pretty much the norm in the US. I had always heard that the European feeds where much bigger. How much history do you keep? With 50gb, we manage to keep about 5days worth of binaries, and about 30 days worth of everything else. > The IDE drives, IMHO, won't be able to cope with this feed. We didn't think the IDE's would work either.. until we tried them. Check out the I/O numbers on the new 7200rmp IDE's vs older SCSI drives. The fact of the matter is that SCSI drive's will alway out perform IDE's. It's all in what you do with them. We have 3 T1's going to/from the news server. Even really old IDE's will stand up pretty well to 4.5mbs throughput. There is one other feature of DNEWS that I didn't mention. It has really good anti-spam features, like the ability to block via a filter file, and the ability to set limits to crossposts. You can even set it to delete the crossposts when the original message expires. We use a really agressive filter, and block about 20% of the binararies coming in. -- Bob Martin, bob@buckhorn.net http://www.buckhorn.net "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message