From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 24 00:12:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A707016A4CE; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:12:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416CD43D58; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:12:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28473097 for multiple; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:56:57 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:11:46 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Eric Anderson Message-Id: <20040723191146.6a4d6cd9@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <4101839D.6030108@centtech.com> References: <1090609869.2748.23.camel@leguin> <4101839D.6030108@centtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Eric Anholt cc: x11@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:12:01 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:31:09 -0500 Eric Anderson wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > >OK, the final version of the X.Org conversion patch has hit the > >tree. No ports appear to be broken by the upgrade at this time. > >X.Org has been made the default X distribution on -current. Other > >versions of FreeBSD retain the same default X distribution > >(XFree86) but can upgrade by setting X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg in > >/etc/make.conf. > > > > Sorry if I'm in the stone age here, but I why is this better than > XFree86? Just curious. Other than it includes a few bug fixes and a proper acecad driver, it is not. As of currently it is just talk and what will happen with X.org and XFree86 are still up in the air.