From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Feb 14 23:43:53 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id XAA07365 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 23:43:53 -0800
Received: from belgarath.it.com.au (root@belgarath.it.com.au [203.8.116.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA07316 for <freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 23:37:53 -0800
Received: by belgarath.it.com.au (Smail3.1.29.1 #5)
	id m0reeIV-00020T5; Wed, 15 Feb 95 15:37 WET
Message-Id: <m0reeIV-00020T5@belgarath.it.com.au>
Subject: Routing with subnets
To: freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 15:37:15 +0800 (WST)
From: "Stephen Darragh" <stephen@belgarath.it.com.au>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 320       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

G'day...

I'm using FreeBSD 2.1 development (950210 snapshot).

I want to have this route :

203.8.116.40     203.8.116.4        UGSc        0        0       ed0

(with netmask 255.255.255.248)

route traffic to 203.8.116.41/42/43/44/45/46 via 203.8.116.4 instead of via
the default route.

Why doesn't it?

... Stephen