From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jul 21 10:10:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4826A37B407 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6LHA1086986; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107211710.f6LHA1086986@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Barcroft Subject: Re: kern/12484: [PATCH] bpf_filter() broken Reply-To: Mike Barcroft Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/12484; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Barcroft To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/12484: [PATCH] bpf_filter() broken Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 13:18:45 -0400 Adding this to the Audit-Trail. On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:40:39PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > I kept the following private mail about this: > > > From bde@zeta.org.au Wed Aug 16 03:34:22 2000 +1000 > > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 03:34:20 +1000 (EST) > > From: Bruce Evans > > X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org > > To: Johan Karlsson > > Subject: Re: PR 12484 and your commit rev 1.14 of src/sys/net/bpf_filter.c > > In-Reply-To: <200008150757.JAA13997@numeri.campus.luth.se> > > Message-ID: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Status: O > > X-Status: > > X-Keywords: > > X-UID: 859 > > > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Johan Karlsson wrote: > > > > > Hi Bruce > > > It seems you commited a fix for PR 12484 in rev 1.14 of > > > src/sys/net/bpf_filter.c. > > > > > > Can the PR be closed or should the > > > "inconsistent and probably unnecessarily pessimal" checks > > > be fixed first? > > > > I don't know bpf well enough to be sure of more than the formal > > correctness of the fix. The people on the Cc line of the PR > > should know :-). Craig Leres didn't seem to have any objections. > > > > The efficiency issues were more interesting on old (slow) hardware. > > > > PR 16644 is also about this. Its author is also at LBL, but seems > > to be as confused as usual. > > > > Bruce > > Bruce > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message