From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:35:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861E016A41F; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mvs2.plala.or.jp (c158130.vh.plala.or.jp [210.150.158.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905EF43D4C; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:35:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hub.bbnest.net ([220.220.221.240]) by mvs2.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20051109053510.LXQJ20697.mvs2.plala.or.jp@hub.bbnest.net>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:35:10 +0900 Received: from [10.0.0.2] (nest.bbnest.net [10.0.0.2]) by hub.bbnest.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA95Z9a7001042; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:35:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <437189E2.1040405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:32:18 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050930 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sean@mcneil.com References: <1126680998.14844.2.camel@localhost> <4327DBC7.2090707@ebs.gr> <1127115472.1082.15.camel@localhost> <432E6E1B.8020108@ebs.gr> <1127129214.997.5.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <1131402336.1264.6.camel@localhost> <437052E9.2040004@FreeBSD.org> <1131444971.69134.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> <4370906B.4090206@FreeBSD.org> <1131473519.95131.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1131506115.98117.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <1131506115.98117.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eclipse@FreeBSD.org, gnome Subject: Re: Failed to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 (failed on cario) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:35:13 -0000 Sean McNeil wrote: >On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 10:11 -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:47 +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: >> >> >>>Sean McNeil wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>...... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>FWIW, you can find a patch to eclipse that I use for 3.1+gnome 2.12 at >>>>>>>http://andreas.syndrom23.de/dump/eclipse-3.1-cairo.diff >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>Any chance to get this patch commited ? >>>>>>java/eclipse still does not build with gnome-2.12 (already in tree). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>I did this yesterday. Cvsup. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>One caveat (as mentioned on another thread) - The patches incorporated >>>>only fix the problem for x86. amd64 systems still fail to build >>>>properly. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Very strange. The build log you showed in eclipse@ looks exactly like >>>cairo related build faulre w/o patches commited yesterday. Are you sure >>>you have file manualpatch-plugins-swt-cairo in files/ directory? >>>As last resort I can recommend to build eclipse with WITHOUT_CAIRO=yes >>>for now. >>> >>> >>Positive. The problem is that amd64 uses a different SWT: >> >>plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.freebsd.amd64 >> >>plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.freebsd.amd64/src/Eclipse SWT >>PI/cairo/library/cairo.c needs to be patched as well. >> >> > >To follow up, it appears that the files patched are just for the >standard 32-bit implementation. For 64-bit, those files appear to be >copied over then regenerated from the class file. So, the problem is >that Cairo.java is not patched and it doesn't correspond to the new >cairo.c. Using cairo in its current state should not really be possible >even on i386 as they don't match up. > > Sounds like true. But I am not an eclipse expert. Please speak up to patch author to finish this work. Thanks, Alexander.