From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 23:46:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BDD106566B for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779508FC08 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so2721062yxb.13 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:46:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D0ogMoo7JWKlcImdSIdj9Qxlu1tGK+gXp+6v08kNeRM=; b=mJaTrWgAiaL2Tn3MVxt9G+zP3OGi0+OgC3h8l7XPAVjTetZqKdiCn2NQpZltkfP3HH tmfIlx6//QjqMa2N00JBIYWReuBZKF8zqkyIRmlk0meZBwo8YDEicTSO74JhkpVxTxzZ ZXFXB+JDAL+D1Hx9ZqtJTGwFH59KTbVRMfosA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F0IGQ3liiGNcxSKrMhWl/2ygbenk8ftsGnX+jKNLlgTdEklMzVJkQY04m+ioefyn7L E0A3Iu9eNyN0hIp+KDFkHpp6TuEu94B3z+VHbH1pF1deyGxCqdU376LFzN0QBz99lH8d F+SCCaRmuI4W3gyi1oYVXBp/ZJ4lK7LTDlIMg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.50.13 with SMTP id c13mr1345973ybk.47.1243467988886; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:46:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6C96EEF057EDE24197FECB0D1EA035044A8F6EB461@h1341255.aoemedia.de> <744a9119476160472a319bbc9f4fd799.squirrel@relay.lc-words.com> <065001c9def1$54ae3f40$fe0abdc0$@za.org> <20090527221211.GB55127@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:46:28 -0500 Message-ID: From: Neal Hogan To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:46:30 -0000 On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> No! Unless you think that fBSd is the only functional/reliable OS. If > > for my needs it's actually true. Only FreeBSD meets my requirements. ok . . . > >> Wojciech, I, like many others who have responded on this thread, >> appreciate much of the help that you provide on this list. You seem to >> fail (for whatever reason) to understand that your opinionated >> comments may need to be better thought out. If you were the "monitor" >> of your utopian mailing list, what would you have done with your > > Of course - you already decided about "utopian". no argument for this. > >> response to the OP? > > as i said (another example you don't read what i write carefully) i would > first define strict rules of posting. > > and then moderators should only execute them. If i would be moderator i > could only do this, or stop being moderator. > > If rules would allow any discussion if moderator should or should not delete > post, then rules are wrong and must be fixed. > > moderator can not have any power to resolve personal things through it. I read what you posted "carefully." I'm asking you to play pretend . . . if you were the moderator of the list you suggest, do you think that the response you gave to the OP, as a non-developer, is acceptable. That is, do you think that that those who have no responsibility as far as what is done with $$ donated to the fBSD cause (i.e., you) should respond to to those who wish to donate? For a minute there, I was hoping that it was a language issue (BTW - I think your English is quite good), but now I think it's an attention issue. > -- www.nealhogan.net www.lambdaserver.com