From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 21 08:18:34 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890CF1065672;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A021723D351;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:18:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E0053D9.4020405@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:18:33 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl>
References: <201106202202.p5KM2ro0040297@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4DFFCA3B.4030307@FreeBSD.org> <4DFFD124.2030902@rainbow-runner.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4DFFD124.2030902@rainbow-runner.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: gcc-clang issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:18:34 -0000

Am 21.06.2011 01:00, schrieb Koop Mast:

> Hey, could you try this patch? I try the USE_CSTD=gnu89 trick if I get
> symbol troubles when linking. This is because clang defaults to gnu99
> while gcc still defaults to gnu89. From what I remember the inline
> keyword has different meanings between the two, or how you use it
> atleast. Someone explained it to my last year but I can't remember all
> the gory details about it.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/e2fsprogs-clang.diff

Gorgeous, works and passes self-tests (on RELENG_8 at least). Committed,
dank je wel!