From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 24 00:33:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDDA16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:33:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35443D31
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:33:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eta@lclark.edu)
Received: from [192.168.0.103]
	(c-24-21-18-195.client.comcast.net[24.21.18.195])
	by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP
	id <200407240033190130027lche>; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:33:19 +0000
From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
To: conrads@cox.net
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040723192528.conrads@cox.net>
References: <XFMail.20040723192528.conrads@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1090629198.44506.3.camel@leguin>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:33:18 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:33:20 -0000

On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:25, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On 24-Jul-2004 Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> >> 
> >> Just one question: have the inconsistencies been worked out in
> >> translating XFree86 fonts package dependencies to Xorg fonts
> >> packages? Have all ports that depend on XFree86 fonts packages
> >> been adjusted, and if so, how was this issue resolved?
> > 
> > Yes, it was dealt with by making those ports point at the font
> > package that provides truetype fonts.
> 
> OK, but then what about the dependencies on Type1 fonts?  Those have
> all just been dropped?  Might it not be better to ensure that both
> packages are listed now as dependencies?

Do those package actually depend on type1 fonts?  If so, then they
should be fixed to depend on them.

I didn't investigate deeply.  I'm pretty sure they just want a pretty
scalable font.

-- 
Eric Anholt                                eta@lclark.edu          
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         anholt@FreeBSD.org