From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 27 13: 5:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F202037B400 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FCA43E42 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7RK5BMA099311; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:05:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with UUCP id g7RK5BFh099310; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:05:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from grimreaper.grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7RK4gl5023435; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:04:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org) Message-Id: <200208272004.g7RK4gl5023435@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Jens Rehsack Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only References: <3D6BD999.10753D8E@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <3D6BD999.10753D8E@liwing.de> ; from Jens Rehsack "Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:57:13 +0200." Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:04:42 +0100 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Hmm. Most gurus will avoid it, and I suspect it will become a > > duplicate of freebsd-questions. > > I don't believe that. I can surely speak for the germans here - I know > many of the would respond to questions if -security-questions. And if > I'm honest, many questions I see in -questions I'd like to see in f.e. > -security(-questions), because the -questions is a very low knowledge list. Hmm. OK. I'll bite. Ask core for this formally, and convince them (us!) that this is needed, and I will champion your cause. > > OK - you have a deal! If you annoy us properly by submitting enough > > good-quality documenation upgrades, I'll punish you by a) ensuring they > > are committed, and b) if enough of them come, ensuring that you can commit > > them your damn self ;-) > > a) ok > b) not ok. I'm a developer and boss of a small company. I do not have > enough time to "really" prove into last final detail and the risk > that I submit (because it has to be fast) not enought tested and > verified stuff. :-) Enough of a) means that b) is inevitable! M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message