From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 15:29:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E6416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao06.cox.net (fed1mtao06.cox.net [68.6.19.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C6D43D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:29:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rich@hogben.org) Received: from top ([68.101.227.106]) by fed1mtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040129232929.HOI2425.fed1mtao06.cox.net@top>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:29:29 -0500 From: "Richard Hogben" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:29:29 -0800 Message-ID: <003d01c3e6bf$be398ad0$0400a8c0@top> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <20040129205929.GA64252@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: buildworld errors on clean 4.9 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:29:32 -0000 It's stange though because without that option, everything went fine, I finished my build and installed, and I have found the same thing happened with others... I used the -j option at home no problem, but this laptop didn't like it for some reason. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:59 PM To: Richard Hogben Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: buildworld errors on clean 4.9 install On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:55:23AM -0800, Richard Hogben wrote: > Thanks, some searching on Google pointed to the same thing, seems the -j > option is not always a good idea for single processor computers. I have > been building since this morning, and no errors as of yet! -j shouldn't cause errors (I use it all the time), it's just the wrong thing to use when you're trying to get help with a build error. Kris