From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 8 23:53:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AF2315794 for ; Sat, 8 May 1999 23:53:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10gNSa-0001fI-00; Sat, 8 May 1999 23:53:12 -0700 Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 23:53:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: tetragon@cyber.com.au Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS question.. In-Reply-To: <3734FBD7.CB44EA7@bitey.cyber.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 9 May 1999, Gavan McCormack wrote: > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so far no > free Unixen have v3 implemented yet. I guess we will just have to wait.. :/ This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. It just needs more testing. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message