From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 13:19:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9171540F; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm136.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1998229B3; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private (p549B5CF3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.155.92.243]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s64DJdqQ000624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:19:40 +0200 Received: from tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private (tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B6E850D3C3; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:19:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:19:34 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: Latest c-icap update Message-ID: <20140704151934.22fbc123@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it> References: <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it> Reply-To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.7.4.130919 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII Cc: mm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:19:50 -0000 Am Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:20:49 +0200 schrieb Andrea Venturoli : > I see lots of bug reports on the net wrt to c-icap on FreeBSD and > signal 11; however I believe they are all referring to old, now > solved, problems. Is it so? I am running c-icap on 10.0-RELEASE and have been waiting for the right time to address this issue. From the very beginning I have been observing these numerous signal 11 kernel errors in my syslog. I am currently the only user using squid+c-icap+squidclamav on my FreeBSD server. In spite of the above errors I could not yet detect any restrictions or errors on the application level e.g. when browsing the internet. This is the reason why I have delayed any PR on this. Regards, Peter