From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 19 21:53:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04A016A401 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC8043D55 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56731A4D7C; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:53:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CA5751753; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:53:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:53:19 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andreas Davour Message-ID: <20060319215319.GA7433@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <441D5462.4000804@uni-mainz.de> <20060319175009.GA3337@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: GCC 4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:53:23 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 10:12:08PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 01:53:54PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>Hello. > >>This maybe a OT questions here, but I would like to know whether there > >>are plans to make gcc 4.X the standard compiler for FreeBSD > > > >Yes. > > > >>and in case > >>of a positive answere, when this will be the case. > > > >Probably over the next few months. It is unlikely ever to be merged > >to 6.x though. >=20 > You mean, it's about to be done for 7.x and further releases? Yes. Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEHdLPWry0BWjoQKURAuhtAKCkWOmb0byFKhWB8A8JO+D6lCjqfQCfQa5Z 5d7z1Xb6MC+0Tb7mNfF3hBk= =zGbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--