From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 18:02:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F4416A4CE; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.sanda.gr.jp (ns1.sanda.gr.jp [219.117.208.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2504043D1D; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:02:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from non@ever.sanda.gr.jp) Received: from oliv.ever.sanda.gr.jp (oliv [10.93.63.4]) by ns1.sanda.gr.jp (8.11.6/3.7W) with ESMTP id i24228r18212; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:02:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.ever.sanda.gr.jp [127.0.0.1]) by oliv.ever.sanda.gr.jp (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i24226Yw064646; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:02:07 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from non@ever.sanda.gr.jp) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:02:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040304.110206.36183582.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> To: rik@cronyx.ru From: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp In-Reply-To: <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> References: <20040303.102155.38697537.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040303.104935.73668905.imp@bsdimp.com> <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rik@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 02:02:11 -0000 From: Roman Kurakin Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300 > Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but > it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis > > 1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation. > So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users. Currently, no. Pages in man4.i386 are also installed for i386/pc98. > 2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added > we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would > be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users. Well, I have had ct.4 for several months. I was suggested not to commit ct.4 into man4.i386 but to create man4.pc98 and add into it by Warner-san. Probably we can create man4.pc98, then copy and modify Makefile so that we don't have to put copys into man4.pc98 (I am not sure here), and change src/share/man/man4/Makefile, --- /usr/src/share/man/man4/Makefile Wed Jul 16 09:03:29 2003 +++ Makefile Thu Mar 4 10:58:07 2004 @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ MLINKS+=xl.4 if_xl.4 # XXX NOT IMPORTED: man4.hp300 man4.sparc man4.tahoe man4.vax -.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE_ARCH}) -SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE_ARCH} +.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE}) +SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE} .endif .include Or maybe, man4/man4.i386 common man4/man4.i386/i386 specific to i386 man4/man4.i386/pc98 specific to pc98 // Noriaki Mitsunaga