From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 20 16:12:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A3D16A403 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [212.100.226.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAD143D62 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from [130.83.72.99] (x99.vpn.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.72.99]) by thing.verysmall.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551B022873 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:07:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4538F586.20705@verysmall.org> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:12:54 +0200 From: "pobox@verysmall.org" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4538B2AF.3080006@verysmall.org> <20061020142207.GA6298@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <20061020142207.GA6298@gothmog.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:12:57 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > You're wrong. It's the other way around: > > We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without > any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of > mirrors, users and developer workspaces. > > On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-) What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on cvs - is that correct? May be it was a complicated way to ask.