From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 17:18:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31AF4654; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6E32E6D; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:18:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmwGAJbhtlNbsUTR/2dsb2JhbABagw5Sg0nDPAGBChd1hAMBAQUjMyMQCxgCAgUhAgIPKh4GExuIKwEIrzKbHBMEgSyNdgeCd4FMBZp1lA2DRTsv Received: from 209.68-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.68.209]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2014 19:18:20 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s64HIIiU013778; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 19:18:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 19:18:17 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Marko =?utf-8?Q?Cupa=C4=87?= Subject: Re: Latest c-icap update Message-ID: <20140704191817.303cf68a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa@mimar.rs> References: <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it> <20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa@mimar.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Andrea Venturoli , mm@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:18:28 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:40:57 +0200 Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:20:49 +0200 > Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> I see lots of bug reports on the net wrt to c-icap on FreeBSD and >> signal 11; however I believe they are all referring to old, now >> solved, problems. Is it so? >=20 > Those are probably mostly mine. I can't get squidclamav get to work on > 10.0 without exiting on signals 10 and 11. I had a correspondence in > March directly with Gilles Darold, author of squidclamav. He was > helpful, sending me experimental code for testing, but finally > instructed me to "use a Linux distribution instead I think you will be > more sure to have a working solution", until he figures things out. >=20 > Since then, I am monitoring ports for new versions of c-icap and > squidclamav, update every time new port is out, enable squidclamav in > squid configuration only to see it crashing after a few minutes, then > disabling it back. >=20 > My PR opened here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D190336 If you build c-icap with the POSIXSEM option enabled does that make any difference? Anything interesting in the server log? What if you set DebugLevel to 10 in the config file?