From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 22:31:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD1516A4CE; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:31:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (fed1rmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.241.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CB243D41; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcamou@opensea.malexa.org.mx) Received: from opensea.cox.net ([68.0.141.123]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20050203223113.BTIY9332.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@opensea.cox.net>; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:31:13 -0500 Received: from opensea.cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by opensea.cox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j13MXmiQ009250; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:33:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jcamou@opensea.malexa.org.mx) Received: (from jcamou@localhost) by opensea.cox.net (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j13MXmMn009249; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:33:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jcamou) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:33:47 -0700 From: "Jesus R. Camou" To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20050203223347.GI182@opensea> References: <200502031120.j13BKjSA057485@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502031120.j13BKjSA057485@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/76985: [PATCH] faq-mailing-list article corrections X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 22:31:19 -0000 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:45AM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] faq-mailing-list article corrections > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: keramida > State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 3 11:18:37 GMT 2005 > State-Changed-Why: > I've committed most of the fixes. Only one was left out: > The s/net.citizens/net citizens/ stuff. > > I think the original author was trying to make a pun with > the words "net", "citizen" and the format of Internet host > names here. It's not entirely wrong, but it's not entirely > correct either. So, what would you prefer? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76985 I actually thought of this, I knew this was not an error. Although it makes sense, I did not find the term quite formal. The reason of this particularly change request was due to reading comfortness and correctness within the article. As keramida@ said, it is not entirely correct, as well as not entirely wrong. Personally, I prefer the change, but you are the ones taking the decisions, I absolutely trust your criteria. :-) -- Jesus R. Camou jcamou@es.FreeBSD.org