From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Mar 2 12:38:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B01014D89 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:38:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA095657081; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:38:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:38:01 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Brett Glass Cc: Adam Turoff , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's > recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on > all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? RELENG_2_2 is dead. RELENG_3 is whats here and now. > I still think it's an unfortunate development, though. Maybe > it's possible to bring in more code from the Net or the CD > after the boot, to keep the boot to one floppy. We've put this off long enough. jkh can give you million reasons why he is more happy with the 2-floppy solution. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message