From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Aug 2 13:22:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962C537C0C4 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id WAA75578; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:22:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA34799; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:22:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:22:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels (PICOBSD). In-Reply-To: <20000717152514.A2056@mithrandr.moria.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If I were to do/start the work on the rest of the system, would this be > acceptable? Initial patch attached. (There seems to be "quirk" fixes > mixed in with the cosmetic stuff, so the patches aren't as clean as they > could be.) This sounds like a great idea to me. I've been pondering hacking up patches for BUILD_TINY/BUILD_SMALL options throughout various system utilities, but I just haven't had the time to look at it yet. Being able to tune various parts of the build process better (memory footprint vs speed etc..) would allow us to tailor PicoBSD to more uses than we're currently able to. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message