From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 19:30:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA831065672 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319948FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so297877pbb.13 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wcas9Yr4AsO5VPrH2joJ8ZvHQCfyBPWGNm5KdFpSnXk=; b=Doz4EGzVJyApshHQZskEPYfZeG91QCqR9/Ub8lD5iXaTZY5KPMbHt8HQhE3eDAHQP4 u+lseEmMtj9nPT1wdGts3HhrbdaZmlvJRi3RjuT5yzIn+a1vEVskrHXMXkkjoVjB+a7u DGN2LTZ6b4NDVgW3dXrAzeKTuZNnJecWmXiLPKHZZIJTQm80Kw/8pWZoG4Jdw2Co+gtd qrDwc5smnmcqVriIyb1Hr9gzvPw8Hl46TnlYdg/Q0EKCS6ZA7nf+L9igKkhfyAFb65j/ /THIeJLoG6YRCD0oqRTNkppvRkHR7BGV9dEuBwi9ki5XHe7zdNuGYf0JlW1wIvmVHtYO k4EA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.238.74 with SMTP id vi10mr7140552pbc.48.1345059013432; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.43.169 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <62153.1345056899@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <62153.1345056899@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:30:13 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hr1pUsfBJNXF-eF3UgVm5SA-8eE Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Poul-Henning Kamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Plassche Subject: Re: [maybe spam] Re: FreeBSD 1.x Binaries Work Except under Chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:30:14 -0000 On 15 August 2012 11:54, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message > , Adrian Chadd writes: >>Holy. Crap. 17 seconds? >> >>Can we please go back to having it take this long? please? > > 386BSD was even better, and I have a machine that boots it in less > than 15 seconds from power-on... :-) Embedded systems stuff will love you if we could slim the build and binary/library size down by this much. Sheesh, compilers do a lot of work these days, don't they? Has anyone done a (recent) comparison of execution size/efficiency given the evolution of GCC? Adrian