From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 30 22:56:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA22203 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:56:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA22198 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:56:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca36-54.ix.netcom.com [207.92.172.54]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA02918; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id WAA13199; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:56:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:56:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199812010656.WAA13199@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: archie@whistle.com CC: committers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199812010613.WAA25515@bubba.whistle.com> (message from Archie Cobbs on Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:13:12 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: ports tree FROZEN now From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * Thoughts? I don't particularly want to lock everyone out -- I just want people to ask for approval before committing. Unless we implement some sort of authentication ticket scheme with cvs, I don't think that's possible. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message