From owner-cvs-all Sat Oct 27 10:42:56 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5568E37B401; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f9RHgiA12006; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:42:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:42:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: Robert Watson Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_acl.c In-Reply-To: <200110270539.f9R5dHY50655@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Robert Watson wrote: :rwatson 2001/10/26 22:39:17 PDT : : Log: : o Althought this is not specified in POSIX.1e, the UFS ACL implementation : coerces the deletion of a default ACL on a directory when no default Is there something that we can say to describe our compatibility with standards (POSIX.1e, other gov standards)? I realize that we'd enjoy to adhere to POSIX.1e, but it isn't a requirement that we do so... So do we just say "We're POSIX.1e compliant... sorta kinda maybe" ? Andrew *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message