From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Dec 7 18:39:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.ihug.co.nz (tk1.ihug.co.nz [203.29.160.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E8114CFD for ; Tue, 7 Dec 1999 18:39:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mmuir@es.co.nz) Received: from es.co.nz (p59-max6.dun.ihug.co.nz [209.77.130.123]) by smtp1.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id PAA06062; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 15:39:18 +1300 Message-ID: <384DC4D4.99AB4960@es.co.nz> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 15:39:16 +1300 From: Mike Muir X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Samba Performance References: <199912080048.LAA49651@ares.maths.adelaide.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg Lewis wrote: > > I have no idea of the actual traffic speed, but I find we get throughput > which appears qualitatively to be respectable with these socket options: > > socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY > > Without these options the performance wasn't nearly as good. YMMV. I already had TCP_NODELAY...but... smb: \incoming\> put #math.xchatlog putting file #math.xchatlog as \incoming\#math.xchatlog (107.262 kb/s) (average 107.262 kb/s) smb: \incoming\> get #math.xchatlog getting file #math.xchatlog of size 2692307 as #math.xchatlog (1021.84 kb/s) (average 1021.84 kb/s) From speeds increased (quite a bit.. now we're talking :) but upload (incoming) speeds still suck ass.. hrmph. mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message