From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 2 22:10:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6A416A418 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADEA13C46E for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lB2MA2wS075566 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lB2MA28v075565; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <200712022210.lB2MA28v075565@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= Cc: Subject: Re: ports/118372: devel/STLport 5.1.4 port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/118372; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= To: Thierry Thomas Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118372: devel/STLport 5.1.4 port. Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:32:43 +0100 Thierry Thomas wrote, On 2.12.2007 21:33: > Hello, > > I have been working on such an upgrade, with the following patch: > > > > It includes a regression-test: target, which is running OK on i386, but > is eating all the available memory on amd64. Did you run these tests? > > Regards, Hi, I did run the tests but I have only i386 box to test with and I have not noticed the behaviour you describe. -- VH