From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 10 17:14:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D9816A4DF for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from com1.ht-systems.ru (com1.ht-systems.ru [83.97.104.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4EF43D5F for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from [217.118.83.1] (helo=fonon.realnet) by com1.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GBE6W-00073N-MM for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:13:59 +0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fonon.realnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5025E1261B for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:13:33 +0600 (YEKST) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:13:33 +0600 From: Stanislav Sedov To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060810211333.2d0a73fe@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200608101311.k7ADBDWn075286@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200608101311.k7ADBDWn075286@lurza.secnetix.de> Organization: MBSD labs, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Spam-Flag: SKIP X-Spam-Yversion: Spamooborona 1.6.0 Subject: Re: make(1) is broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:14:03 -0000 --Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:11:13 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme mentioned: > I think it is better not to rely on that side effect. It > isn't well documented and might change without notice in > the future. Thanks for explanation. I suppose, however, that .for behavior could be used rather safely for it's well documented in make(1). According to this manpage, it's not a side effect - .for loops always unrolled and variable substitutions occurs. Thanks for all answers!=20 --=20 Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. =F2=CF=D3=D3=C9=D1, =ED=CF=D3=CB=D7=C1 http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 --Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE200dK/VZk+smlYERAtyXAJ9YV/BhG74rMVtOnQSOYfE15HclTgCeMMtt B0eg1XiQqQRPFfXuc02Y40M= =BjTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h--