From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 22 06:27:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA29823 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1721.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA29774; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 06:27:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19577; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 09:25:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Message-ID: <19980722092547.C16686@zappo> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 09:25:47 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Gregory Sutter , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Open Source Town Meeting" supports only one faction References: <19980722000542.56979@futuresouth.com> <19980721223151.B15764@notabene.zer0.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19980721223151.B15764@notabene.zer0.org>; from Gregory Sutter on Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 10:31:51PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 10:31:51PM -0700, Gregory Sutter wrote: > > I know this will just stir up trouble in the thread, but... > if X11 was free software instead of just open source, TOG couldn't have > changed the license to a semicommercial one. Of course, if free in Naw, then they could just have demanded copyright assignment like the FSF and then have changed the license into a fully commercial one. -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message