From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 16 15:15:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144B815519 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:15:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA72148; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Aug 1999 16:00:59 +0200." <15193.934725659@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:08 -0700 Message-ID: <72144.934841588@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I kinda like the idea of a top-level compat category; it will keep the top level uncluttered when sysv and iBCS compatibility start requiring their own knobs, and if you put linux at the top level this will later be used as justification for putting all the other "compat" stuff up there too. I think it's a slippery slope. - Jordan > In message <37B6C425.CB48277A@scc.nl>, Marcel Moolenaar writes: > >Hi, > > > >There're a couple of variables in the Linuxulator that can be put under > >sysctl. These include the kernel version and the OSS version, among > >probably others. > > > >The question is simply were in the MIB to put them? > >1) under "kern.linux" > >2) under "kern.emu.linux" > >3) under "linux" > > I vote for 3. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member > phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." > FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message