From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 14 00:51:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04259 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:51:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.netcetera.dk (root@sleipner.netcetera.dk [194.192.207.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04250 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:51:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@image.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.netcetera.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id JAA26413 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 09:50:56 +0100 Received: by swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk (0.99.970109) id AA01678; 14 Mar 98 09:54:05 +0100 From: leifn@image.dk (Leif Neland) Date: 14 Mar 98 09:43:15 +0100 Subject: Change in fstab, was: re: Help! Upgrade 2.2.5-RELEASE to 2.2-STABLE. Message-ID: Organization: Fidonet: Swimsuit Safari. Go for it. To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 14 Mar 98 04:31:44 Doug White wrote regarding Re: Help! Upgrade 2.2.5-RELEASE to 2.2-STABLE. >> P.S. As has been covered in *great* detail this last week, and as is >> also available via the mailing list archives, edit /dev/wd0a to be the >> fully-slice-qualified name, like the other entries. e.g. /dev/wd0s1a. DW> I think I'll have to join Paul in questioning whether this DW> breakage is going to make 2.2.6 a support nightmare. I don't DW> want this to become another ``unknown login class root''-style DW> hailstorm. :-( Would it be to M$-like to have fbsd change /etc/fstab to be like it wants? Or make the message "Run the script /sbin/upgrade/fixup_fstab.sh please" Leif Neland leifn@image.dk --- |Fidonet: Leif Neland 2:234/49 |Internet: leifn@image.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message