From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May 30 11:28:36 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA10259
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:28:36 -0700
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [198.137.146.49])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA10219
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:28:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA01775; Tue, 30 May 1995 12:27:17 -0600
Message-Id: <199505301827.MAA01775@rover.village.org>
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.atinc.com>
Subject: Re: mailing lists 
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 30 May 1995 10:54:36 EDT
Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 12:27:17 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

: 	unfortunately, there just does not appear to be that much overlap 
: in addresses.  even an isp like netcom only shows 9 addresses out of the 
: 527 current subscribed to hackers ;(   ( 527???  now bad, huh? ;)

Would it make sense to find 10 sites that can handle forwarding 50
messages each to other sites near them?  That way freefall gets a
break and only has to send 10 messages for each one that comes in
(plus, say, the people that are local to freefall).

Warner