From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 21:30:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6687F1065677 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7628FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDB01B5E02; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:11:58 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: FkYqHkJ4n2ABc2rGZBl5sWV6SiG1ptMFkW0H6rpgnmPm 1226783518 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (unknown [81.168.51.182]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DB8C2A720; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:11:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <491F3B1B.2040503@incunabulum.net> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:11:55 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strobl References: <200811132230.mADMUC45038539@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200811132230.mADMUC45038539@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in 64-bit PCI slot X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:30:58 -0000 Marius Strobl wrote: > ... > Hrm, I could be that the BCM5701 data corruption bug actually is > 64-bit rather than only PCI-X bus specific. Could you please give > the patch at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bge_5701.diff > a try? > This patch looks syntactically OK, though I don't know about bge register set, perhaps it should go in to 7.1.