From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 16 07:30:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F9EB3CAE3 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE14B1E1A for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4G7URds070278; Mon, 16 May 2016 00:30:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201605160730.u4G7URds070278@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 00:30:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: dummynet + CoDel, FQ-Codel, PIE, and FQ-PIE To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: ralsaadi@swin.edu.au, garmitage@swin.edu.au In-Reply-To: <201605160713.u4G7DobJ070234@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 07:30:37 -0000 On 16 May, To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org wrote: > I'd like to see us get these patches committed to HEAD in time for > 11.0-RELEASE: > > I've been running this stuff on my firewall box for a few months > and it has tamed the latency problems I was having with my DSL > connection to the internet whenever big uploads or downloads were in > progress. Doing this with ALTQ would have been a lot more difficult > even if the CoDel stuff in ALTQ was documented ... I put it up on Phabricator here: