From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 6 09:57:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67A1106566C; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (ns.kirov.so-ups.ru [178.74.170.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704EE8FC0A; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kas30pipe.localhost (localhost.kirov.so-ups.ru [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FA4BB8024; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: from kirov.so-ups.ru (unknown [172.21.81.1]) by mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2E9B801B; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: by ns.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix, from userid 1010) id 64AA4B8F36; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (elsukov.kirov.oduur.so [10.118.3.52]) by ns.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F74B8F28; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:38:48 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4E8D7728.6050608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:38:48 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Strizhak References: <4E8D6702.9070707@pcbtech.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E8D6702.9070707@pcbtech.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release X-SpamTest-Info: Not protected Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" Subject: Re: ipfw nat drops icmp packets from localhost X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:57:27 -0000 On 06.10.2011 12:29, Oleg Strizhak wrote: > After an investigation I've found out a very strange situation - it seems to me, that ipfw nat drops > some (type 11?) icmp reply packets, whose udp request packets it hasn't rewritten/seen before, e.g: > > So, I wonder whether someone else has seen the same case under the similar circumstances? Isn't it a > bug within ipfw nat module and is there any work-around/patch for that? I've surely googled, but in > vain =( The only thing, that seems alike to my problem, is > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129093, but the patch for 8 branch didn't cure anything =( Can you describe how you did apply and test this patch? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov