From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 12 2:40:29 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3737B401; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f1CAeMi22181; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:40:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:40:22 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Kris Kennaway Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile ports/security/openssh/files patch-bleichenbacher Message-ID: <20010212024022.Y3274@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200102120806.f1C86vT29883@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102120806.f1C86vT29883@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:06:57AM -0800 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Kris Kennaway [010212 00:07] wrote: > kris 2001/02/12 00:06:57 PST > > Modified files: > security/openssh Makefile > Added files: > security/openssh/files patch-bleichenbacher > Log: > Add patch to prevent Bleichenbacher attack on SSH1 server. Bump > PORTREVISION. I think patch-az (deattack.c patch) should be renamed to something other than 'patch-az' so it's relevance is noted. Do you wish to do it? Or should I do it sometime tomorrow? > > Revision Changes Path > 1.60 +2 -2 ports/security/openssh/Makefile > -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message