From owner-freebsd-java Mon Mar 6 6:58:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from lugh.relay.co.uk (lugh.relay.co.uk [194.72.177.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF8D37BC74; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 06:58:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john.rochester@enetgroup.co.uk) Received: from raku.enetgroup.co.uk ([194.72.178.7]) by lugh.relay.co.uk (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id FR09JD00.I48; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 14:57:13 +0000 Content-Length: 582 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 14:58:22 -0000 (GMT) From: John Rochester To: Jose Marques Subject: RE: linux-jdk-1.2.2 ports Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, sada@FreeBSD.ORG, SADA Kenji , Joe Shevland Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > And the following patch for FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT was posted to > FreeBSD-current a few days ago: > > Perhaps somebody can test them and send-pr them? NB: I've not tried > this patch myself yet. This appears to be a trivial modification to my original patch, but its reversed - hopefully that won't be a problem. If I remember correctly, the only reason that my patch wouldn't work with CURRENT is because they changed some code that my patch deleted :) ---- John Rochester Java Developer, e-Net Software, Bath, UK john.rochester@enetgroup.co.uk jr@cs.mun.ca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message