From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 28 11:16:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01CD1065696 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-exrelay1.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-EXRELAY1.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422098FC17 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,466,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="283932541" Received: from zivmaildisp2.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.143]) by zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2009 13:15:58 +0200 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER03.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id CAEE11B0750; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:15:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:15:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <86vdj34a4g.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipv6 related warnings X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:16:00 -0000 i understand. so the best thing would be to remove WITHOUT_INET6 from `man src.conf` so people don't get the impression that this option let's you bui= ld world without ipv6 support at all. i'll remove the line from my src.conf, rebuild/-install world and see if th= at fixes it. thanks a lot. alex Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav schrieb am 2009-09-28: > Alexander Best writes: > > oh. i see. so ipv6 support is now mandatory and building a plain > > ipv4 > > kernel is obsolete? shouldn't this be in UPDATING? > No, you can build a *kernel* without IPv6, just not userland. Parts > of > userland will respect WITHOUT_INET6, others won't, and others yet > will > build but not run correctly. > DES