From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 19 6: 4:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7051437B404; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2JE39b07216; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:03:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane) Message-Id: <200203191403.g2JE39b07216@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Alan E Organization: Geeksrus.NET To: Maxim Sobolev Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-XFree86] Re: FW: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile Makefile.man pkg-plist pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 por Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:03:09 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: cjc@FreeBSD.ORG (Crist J. Clark), will@csociety.org (Will Andrews), ports@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org References: <200203190902.g2J92eS04923@vega.vega.com> In-Reply-To: <200203190902.g2J92eS04923@vega.vega.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 19 March 2002 04:02, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:42:05PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > >Am I doing something wrong or does, > > > > > > # cd /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4 > > > # make > > > > > >Take a staggering amount of scratch space with the meta-port approach? > > > > You are not, and it does. > > > > I suggested and will try to test this week a simple set of patches to > > give them all the same WRKDIR and force a clean before each extract. This > > should get the space issue taken care of. I can't get to it before Weds > > since I'm gonna go see Television tomorrow night (NYC is cool sometimes). > > Another slightly different approach is to select one central port, > say XFree86-4-libraries, which would build *all* of XFree86-4, > make other components depend on completion of the build target of > that port and install their portion of XFree86-4 from the central > port's WRKSRC. This approach has many advantages compared to the > current one. What if I don't *want* to build all of it? That's the whole reason for the miniports. What is the difference between that and the megaport? If I just want to rebuild -clients, do I have to build the *whole* thing? IMO That approach totally defeats what was just done. You've essentially said, make it a megaport again, but then fake OpenBSD MULTI_PACKAGES. -- AlanE "When the going gets tough, the weird turn pro." - HST To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message