From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 8 17:24:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D4C16A4DE for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sullrich@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C6243D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sullrich@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so1124938uge for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QGD4T8OgeJtQ/AcMiSjThVytpp6Jk9PZs4FyEUyDNeQP2m7CiXijLpird4Vk1ec4MKG3LMpj1uMWCFXIu0QvkicQOeNiVFRE20Ml7fmSwkaGApWRS3GtnghpIFuSZTlTBWLwd0MBjnw1Qt4CdOM1wvs1eh3gIHTFl/Iz00YATao= Received: by 10.66.244.10 with SMTP id r10mr3204079ugh; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.105.8 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:24:41 -0400 From: "Scott Ullrich" To: "Andre Santos" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Incompatibility between dummynet and PF rdr. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:24:43 -0000 On 7/8/06, Andre Santos wrote: > Are there any known compatibility problems between dummynet and PF rdr rules? > When I try to combine both, the packets seem to simply disappear. [snip] I can confirm this behavior. Glad someone else noticed as it would happen when we try to use dummynet traffic shaping + pf on pfSense. Never really was a high priority to nail down exactly what combination of dummynet + pf was breaking it. If anyone needs me to test patches, just let me know. Scott