From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 17:21:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C400516A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:21:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk (freebsd.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.249.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3639A43D4C; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:21:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@mx1.originative.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B458E15586; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:20:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 35238-08; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:20:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6CA915589; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:20:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:20:50 +0000 From: Paul Richards To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20050310172050.GR98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> References: <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com> <86k6oht386.fsf@xps.des.no> <422F087F.9030906@portaone.com> <20050309.085035.129356491.imp@bsdimp.com> <422F6703.70409@portaone.com> <20050310161607.GO98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <20050310165510.GE993@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050310165510.GE993@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at originative.co.uk cc: Maxim Sobolev cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: alfred@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: des@des.no cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:21:29 -0000 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:55:10AM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > How is this even a problem? The company targets 5.3-RELEASE, period, > for all of 5.x. They do not need to upgrade their build computer to > anything past RELENG_5_3 even in the face of security issues. That really irritating bug that causes their development tools to crash is fixed in 5.5. Clearly they'll want to run with that later version. -- Paul Richards