From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Aug 27 22:48:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA09559 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 22:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [206.84.208.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA09554 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 22:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monet.op.net (darxus@monet.op.net [206.84.208.3]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.14 $) with ESMTP id BAA01799 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 01:48:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (darxus@localhost) by monet.op.net ($Revision: 1.2 $) with SMTP id BAA14867 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 01:48:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: monet.op.net: darxus owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 01:48:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Darxus To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: lameness in #FreeBSD on EFNet (IRC) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am aware of and happy with the fact that IRC belongs to, and is controlled by on-one, and that nobody here is responsible for any behavior in the #FreeBSD channel on the (main) EFNet IRC network. But this seemed as good a place as any to discuss it... well, here's the log, it should speak for itself... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ [ctcp(#freebsd)] EMAIL ~~~ [mode/#FreeBSD(+b *!*arxus@*.bellatlantic.net)] by Obi-Wan ~~~ You were kicked off #freebsd by micro (banned) ~~~ [#freebsd] banned from channel. -BooYaa- my email: booyaa@world-net.net ~~~ [#freebsd] banned from channel. ~~~ [#freebsd] banned from channel. what the hell was that for ? Because I don't want to be ctcp'd so you kick me out of the channel, and now I'm banned, because I did a friggin ctcp request ?? talk to someone else if you want to be unbanned you ban me and don't want to take responsibility for it ?? I take full responsibility, but I'm not going to unban you why ? how is a ctcp request grounds for banning ? because I'm irritable and we don't need /ctcp's to the channel which aren't standard ~ [ctcp(obi-wan)] VERSION ~~~ CTCP VERSION reply from Obi-Wan: ircII 2.9_roof FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE :[PurePak] Kewlness, a more elegant weapon, from a more civilized age it's grounds in my book, I don't care what anyone else thinks so you ctcp me again, this is going nowhere, I'll just ignore you I was curious what you're client was that's a standard ctcp request and the other one is a standard ctcp request for the client I'm using, so I was curious who else decided to use that option ---------------------------------------------------------------------- so I currently can't take part in the discussions in #FreeBSD because this guy's got something against ctcp requests... ________________________________________________________________________ ***PGP fingerprint = D5 EB F8 E7 64 55 CF 91 C2 4F E0 4D 18 B6 7C 27*** darxus@op.net / http://www.op.net/~darxus "You shall know the truth, and it shall make you odd."