From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 15 21:11:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10FBBA4B
 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:11:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6E96A9
 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:11:14 +0000 (UTC)
X_CMAE_Category: , ,
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NotTgrhJ c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17
 a=r2AS94Ni9CsA:10 a=_Id9dGvoE90A:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=LZeR2yysXrmFEi1p1DgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t
Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com
 smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com
 header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral
Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff;
 auth=pass (PLAIN)
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither
 permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com)
Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:58191]
 helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org)
 by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from <roberthuff@rcn.com>)
 (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTPA
 id 56/D6-15227-0F1C4235; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:11:13 -0400
Message-ID: <5324C1E9.6040802@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:11:05 -0400
From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.24
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: changes to base system DNS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:11:15 -0000

 > "rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*" on the old and new systems
 > and compare the locations of named vs. local_unbound?

     On the current system, named comes up as number 74.
     Would someone who uses only unbound report how it works for them?
     Better yet - someone who's using port.bind?

 > So it depends on what capability you are looking for as to whether it 
starts earlier or later. (No easy answers here.)

     Short version: this system is authoritative for its zone, so a 
caching-only resolver is no good.
     Using system bind worked fine; everybody found everything they 
needed at the right time.
     I don't grok the rcorder system: it is my impression that 
everything in /etc/rc.d is provessed independently and before 
/usr/local/etc/rc.d.  If that's true, then it seems like named might 
start after things that need its services.

     Respectfully,


                     Robert Huff