From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 5 6:50:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307F445A1 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2000 06:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12H6Fe-000477-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 14:31:54 +0000 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12H6Fe-0003Vr-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 14:31:54 +0000 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:31:54 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst To: wellsian Cc: "James A. Mutter" , Adam , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Qmail or Sendmail? Message-ID: <20000205143154.A9651@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <389BA4FE.323F2A97@ds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG wellsian wrote: > I agree with James. A "200 user" load should be trivial unless they're all > using pine at the same time. All (sendmail, postfix, qmail) can do the > same things, but qmail and postfix are much simpler to configure and > should have fewer security issues. Don't forget Exim! :-) It's also very easy to configure, and I'm not aware of any security problems with it. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message