From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 22 20:39:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491A4154C2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 20:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA51228; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 20:36:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Brett Glass Cc: chris@calldei.com, "G. Adam Stanislav" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and memetics In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:34:40 MDT." <4.2.0.32.19990422162950.0459b4b0@localhost> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 20:36:37 -0700 Message-ID: <51226.924838597@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Quite a few, at least when I was doing advocacy. I was asked to stop by > Mr. Hubbard, who told me point blank -- at the LinuxWorld show, no > less -- that he did not want FreeBSD to have passionate advocacy. I've told you before, what you define as "passion" is about as akin to actual passion as love is to rape. I have nothing against passionate advocacy, only rabid, unthinking advocacy and what I told you at the LinuxWorld show was that I couldn't support that kind of LA riot mentality. If you took this as my being down on "passionate advocacy" then I can only strongly question your definition of that word. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message