From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 19:10:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64BB47E for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FAD31FF7 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ym5TR-000Mls-2X; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 22:10:45 +0300 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 22:10:45 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Shawn Webb Cc: Joerg Sonnenberger , svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r281959 - head/usr.bin/whois Message-ID: <20150425191044.GW1394@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201504250051.t3P0pitf037355@svn.freebsd.org> <20150425145149.GB25518@britannica.bec.de> <1429974286.5017.1.camel@hardenedbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1429974286.5017.1.camel@hardenedbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:10:56 -0000 On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:04:46AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 16:51 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:51:44AM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > > > Attempt to connect to alternate addresses if the connect doesn't > > > succeed in 180ms, and cut wait time between connection attempts > > > in half for each additional, if no connection was established. > > > > 180ms is very short. I have such latency over 2G, 3G and 4G most of the > > time, soo wouldn't this make whois pretty much useless on such > > connections? > > Google Chromium/Chrome uses a 300ms timeout when falling back from IPv6 > to IPv4. Maybe the 180ms timeout should be increased to match? Acceptable timeout must be 2000ms minimum (two satelite link with some reserve). Independently from google/chrome/microsoft/ibm/etc.