From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Mar 15 10: 8:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from piglet.ucsf.edu (piglet.ucsf.EDU [128.218.67.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F7114F96 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:08:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@piglet.ucsf.edu) Received: (from steve@localhost) by piglet.ucsf.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id KAA87567 for alpha@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:07:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:07:53 -0800 From: Steve Sizemore To: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Which version to run Message-ID: <19990315100753.A87394@cmpharm.ucsf.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, all. Now that I've finally managed to get FreeBSD running on one of my alphas, I'm wondering which version I should be tracking. In order to install, I had to use a 4.0 snapshot. However, I'd really rather track stable (since that's what I use on my intel machines), if that is possible. Is 3.1 stable really stable for the alpha platform, or do I need to use current? Thanks. Steve -- ----------------------------------------------#-----#--#####--------------- # # # # Steve Sizemore # # # Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology # # # Box 0450, Room HSE-1285 # # # University of California Medical Center # # # # 513 Parnassus Avenue ##### ##### ##### ####### San Francisco CA 94143-0450 # # # # # steve@cmpharm.ucsf.edu ##### ##### (415) 476-6987 FAX: (415) 476-6515 # # # # # -------------------------------------------------------------#####--#------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message