From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 11:11:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C07037B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fubar.adept.org (fubar.adept.org [63.147.172.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2146043F85 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: by fubar.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 172661524B; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fubar.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1650715247 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1057774214.1862.7.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Message-ID: <20030709111046.P77890@fubar.adept.org> References: <1057774214.1862.7.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: /var error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:11:59 -0000 On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 18:05, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > I think it's just Linux/SysV folks that are used to lsof. > Linux and System V have fuser; lsof used to be the BSD workaround for > lack of it. True, but every Linux admin I've seen uses lsof... The RPM's always installed. Ditto for the Solaris package. Maybe it's just the people I've worked with. ;) Whatever it is, I don't think it's so much lsof's superiority as it's seeming ubiquity. -mrh -- From: "Spam Catcher" To: spam-catcher@adept.org Do NOT send email to the address listed above or you will be added to a blacklist!