From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May  9 17:09:19 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA00684
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 May 1995 17:09:19 -0700
Received: from caern.protocorp.com (d4.leonardo.net [198.147.97.68])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA00678
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 May 1995 17:09:16 -0700
Received: from caern.leonardo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caern.protocorp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA00285; Tue, 9 May 1995 17:08:26 -0700
Message-Id: <199505100008.RAA00285@caern.protocorp.com>
To: Bakul Shah <bakul@netcom.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: This one looks very very suspecious to me.... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 May 1995 16:49:01 PDT."
             <199505092349.QAA26870@netcom14.netcom.com> 
Date: Tue, 09 May 1995 17:08:23 -0700
From: "Mike O'Brien" <obrien@leonardo.net>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> This is more of a problem with the Rand editor than anything
> else.  I've never seen worse abuse of cpp than in the Rand
> editor (not counting Obfuscated C contest entrants).  Not
> sure if the -traditional flag may have helped.

Tsk. Legal is as legal does. :-)  I don't think it should have any
business trying to pick character constants out of something inside
an excluded #ifdef block.  I should be able to put raw random bits
in there.  Well, ok, maybe we'll allow that it has to be a legal
charset.

> If you did a successful port, I'd *really* really like a
> copy of ported e19 sources.  Thanks!

	Still working on it.  It runs, but has problems.  It may be due
to the curses library, or it may be something else.  I'll announce a
'port' or a 'package' or something when I've got it going OK.

Mike O'Brien